4943 results found

1. Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium (CAPD)

   Escala delirium en pediatría- uci pediátrica

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  General  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Mnemónico LEMON

   Útil para avaliar o potencial de dificuldade da iot

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Roda

   Rdos dispneia em cuidado paliativo

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Pick-10

   PTSD screener

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Female sexual function index

   Female Sexual Function Index
   (FSFI) *
   Response Options
   1 = Almost always or always
   Question
   Q1: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did
   you feel sexual desire or interest?
   2 = Most times (more than half the time)
   3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
   4 = A few times (less than half the time)
   5 = Almost never or never
   1 = Very high
   Q2: Over the past 4 weeks, how would you
   rate your level (degree) of sexual desire or
   interest? 2 = High
   3 = Moderate
   4 = Low
   5 = Very low or none at all
   0 = No sexual activity
   Q3: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did
   you feel sexually aroused (“turned on”) during
   sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Almost always or always
   2 = Most times (more than half the time)
   3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
   4 = A few times (less than half the time)
   5 = Almost never or never
   0 = No sexual activity
   Q4: Over the past 4 weeks, how would you
   rate your level of sexual arousal (“turn on”)
   during sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Very high
   2 = High
   3 = Moderate
   4 = Low
   5 = Very low or none at all
   0 = No sexual activity
   Q5: Over the past 4 weeks, how confident
   were you about becoming sexually aroused
   during sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Very high confidence
   2 = High confidence
   3 = Moderate confidence
   4 = Low confidence
   5 = Very low or no confidence
   0 = No sexual activity
   Q6: Over the past 4 weeks, how often have you
   been satisfied with your arousal (excitement)
   during sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Almost always or always
   2 = Most times (more than half the time)
   3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
   4 = A few times (less than half the time)
   5 = Almost never or never
   0 = No sexual activity
   Q7: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did
   you become lubricated (“wet”) during sexual
   activity or intercourse? 1 = Almost always or always
   2 = Most times (more than half the time)
   3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
   4 = A few times (less than half the time)
   5 = Almost never or never
   0 = No sexual activity
   Q8: Over the past 4 weeks, how difficult
   was it to become lubricated (“wet") during
   sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Extremely difficult or impossible
   2 = Very difficult
   3 = Difficult
   4 = Slightly difficult
   5 = Not difficult
   0 = No sexual activity
   Q9: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did you
   maintain your lubrication (“wetness”) until
   completion of sexual activity or intercourse? 1= Almost always or always
   2 = Most times (more than half the time)
   3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
   4 = A few times (less than half the time)
   5 = Almost never or never
   0 = No sexual activity
   Q10: Over the past 4 weeks, how difficult was
   it to maintain your lubrication (“wetness”) until
   completion of sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Extremely difficult or impossible
   2 = Very difficult
   3 = Difficult
   4 = Slightly difficult
   5 = Not difficult
   0 = No sexual activity
   Q11: Over the past 4 weeks, when you had
   sexual stimulation or intercourse, how
   often did you reach orgasm (climax)? 1 = Almost always or always
   2 = Most times
   3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
   4 = A few times (less than half the time)
   5 = Almost never or never
   0 = No sexual activity
   Q12: Over the past 4 weeks, when you had
   sexual stimulation or intercourse, how
   difficult was it for you to reach orgasm
   (climax)?
   1 = Extremely difficult or impossible
   2 = Very difficult
   3 = Difficult
   4 = Slightly difficult
   5 = Not difficult
   0 = No sexual activity
   Q13: Over the past 4 weeks, how satisfied
   were you with your ability to reach orgasm
   (climax) during sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Very satisfied
   2 = Moderately satisfied
   3 = About equally satisfied and dissatisfied
   4 = Moderately dissatisfied
   5 = Very dissatisfied
   0 = No sexual activity
   1 = Very satisfied
   Q14: Over the past 4 weeks, how satisfied
   have you been with the amount of emotional
   closeness during sexual activity between you
   and your partner?
   2 = Moderately satisfied
   3 = About equally satisfied and dissatisfied
   4 = Moderately dissatisfied
   5 = Very dissatisfied
   1= Very satisfied
   Q15: Over the past 4 weeks, how satisfied
   have you been with your sexual relationship
   with your partner? 2 = Moderately satisfied
   3 = About equally satisfied and dissatisfied
   4 = Moderately dissatisfied
   5 = Very dissatisfied
   1 = Very satisfied
   Q16: Over the past 4 weeks, how satisfied
   have you been with your overall sexual life?
   2= Moderately satisfied
   3 = About equally satisfied and dissatisfied
   4 = Moderately dissatisfied
   5 = Very dissatisfied
   0 = Did not attempt intercourse
   Q17: Over the past 4 weeks, how often
   did you experience discomfort or pain
   during vaginal penetration? 1 = Almost always or always
   2 = Most times (more than half the time)
   3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
   4 = A few times (less than half the time)
   5 = Almost never or never
   0 = Did not attempt intercourse
   Q18: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did
   you experience discomfort or pain following
   vaginal penetration? 1 = Almost always or always
   2 = Most times (more than half the time)
   3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
   4 = A few times (less than half the time)
   5 = Almost never or never
   0 = Did not attempt intercourse
   Q19: Over the past 4 weeks, how would you
   rate your level (degree) of discomfort or
   pain during or following vaginal penetration? 1 = Very high
   2 = High
   3 = Moderate
   4 = Low
   5 =Very low or none at all
   Scoring System
   The individual domain scores and full scale score of the FSFI are derived by the computational formula
   outlined in the table below. Individual domain scores are obtained by adding the scores of the individual
   items that comprise the domain and multiplying the sum by the domain factor (see below). The full scale
   score is obtained by adding the six domain scores. It should be noted that within the individual domains,
   a domain score of zero indicates that no sexual activity was reported during the past month.
   Domain Questions Score range Factor Minimum score Maximum score
   Desire 1, 2 1-5 0.6 1.2 6.0
   Arousal 3, 4, 5, 6 0-5 0.3 0 6.0
   Lubrication 7, 8, 9, 10 0-5 0.3 0 6.0
   Orgasm 11, 12, 13 0-5 0.4 0 6.0
   Satisfaction 14, 15, 16 0 (or 1)-5 0.4 0 6.0
   Pain 17, 18, 19 0-5 0.4 0 6.0
   Full Scale Score Range 2.0 36.0
   *For the complete FSFI questionnaire, instructions, and scoring algorithm, please see
   www.FSFIquestionnaire.com, or contact Raymond Rosen PhD, (Department of Psychiatry:
   UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854)
   Reprinted from: Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a
   multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function.” J Sex
   Marital Ther. 2000;26:191-208, with permission of Taylor & Francis, Ltd.

   Female Sexual Function Index
   (FSFI) *
   Response Options
   1 = Almost always or always
   Question
   Q1: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did
   you feel sexual desire or interest?
   2 = Most times (more than half the time)
   3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
   4 = A few times (less than half the time)
   5 = Almost never or never
   1 = Very high
   Q2: Over the past 4 weeks, how would you
   rate your level (degree) of sexual desire or
   interest? 2 = High
   3 = Moderate
   4 = Low
   5 = Very low or none at… more

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Enhance Existing Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Escores para predizer risco de endocardite por enterococcus

   Escores: DENOVA, DENOVi

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Por favor, coloque NEWS2

   A partir do novo protocolo deste ano pra manejo da sepse, news2 foi indicado como melhor escala para diagnosticar. Por favor, coloquem!

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. UCEIS

   UCEIS: Endoscopic score to evaluate severity of Ulcerative Colitis.

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Fórmula de Nadler
   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  General  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. FA ESC 2024

    Why is there no CHA₂DS₂-VA scale available, even though it has been included in the guidelines since 2024?

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Sugerencia de fórmulas

    ¡Hola! He sido usuaria de MedCalX desde hace más de 10 años y mi experiencia había sido muy buena. Recientemente he notado que faltan fórmulas útiles en medicina interna, la función de los flujos de trabajo que permiten agregar fórmulas y es buena pero no encuentro el sentido en tener que estar saliendo de la app, sobre todo porque no siempre puedo acceder al enlace cuando la conexión a internet es mala. Concretamente sugiero las siguientes fórmulas: ARISCAT, AUB-HAS2, escala de fragilidad de Rockwood, Caprini, NSQIP, NSQIP geriátrico.

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Nutric score

    Nutric score

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Findrisc

    Findrisc = risco de DM tipo 2

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Gerontopole Frailty screening test
    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Fórmula

    Incluir la clasificación de stevenson o nohoria de insuficiencia cardiaca

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Eswep score

    Nos ayuda a decidir si anastomosis o no en cirugía de urgencia

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. EDSS

    Esclerosis múltiple

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Tormenta tiroidea

    Criterios de Burch y wartidsky en una guardia ayudarían mucho poder calcular para valorar un paciente con hipertiroidismo

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Clif-c

    Better than meld

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. KUSS

    KUSS Score für kinder fehlt.

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating