4948 results found

1. 4Ts score

   Calculate pretest probability of heparin induced thrombocytopenia

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. JTA / JSE

   Thyrotoxicosis scoring

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Moreno

   Score de Moreno pour décider de la paramedicalisation ou de la médicalisation d’un transport selon des paramètres cliniques.

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  General  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. VIRSTA Score

   Der Score berücksichtigt unter anderem folgende Parameter, die unterschiedlich gewichtet sind:Nachweis von zerebralen oder peripheren EmbolienVorhandensein von Meningitis (Hirnhautentzündung) oder WirbelkörperentzündungVorerkrankte Herzklappen, Klappenprothesen oder implantierte Herzschrittmacher/DefibrillatorenVorangegangene infektiöse Endokarditis oder intravenöser DrogenkonsumC-reaktives Protein (CRP) über 190 mg/L (19 mg/dL)Dokumentation einer persistierenden Bakteriämie nach mehr als 48 Stunden💡 AuswertungScore ≥ 3: Gilt als positiv/hohes Risiko. Eine Echokardiographie (Ultraschalluntersuchung des Herzens) wird dringend empfohlen.Score ≤ 2: Gilt als negativ/niedriges Risiko. Das Risiko für eine infektiöse Endokarditis ist extrem gering. In vielen Fällen kann die Echokardiographie in dieser Patientengruppe sicher aufgeschoben werden, um Ressourcen

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Ti-Rads

   Tiroides Ecografia PAAF

   0 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  General  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium (CAPD)

   Escala delirium en pediatría- uci pediátrica

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  General  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Mnemónico LEMON

   Útil para avaliar o potencial de dificuldade da iot

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Roda

   Rdos dispneia em cuidado paliativo

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Pick-10

   PTSD screener

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Female sexual function index

    Female Sexual Function Index
    (FSFI) *
    Response Options
    1 = Almost always or always
    Question
    Q1: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did
    you feel sexual desire or interest?
    2 = Most times (more than half the time)
    3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
    4 = A few times (less than half the time)
    5 = Almost never or never
    1 = Very high
    Q2: Over the past 4 weeks, how would you
    rate your level (degree) of sexual desire or
    interest? 2 = High
    3 = Moderate
    4 = Low
    5 = Very low or none at all
    0 = No sexual activity
    Q3: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did
    you feel sexually aroused (“turned on”) during
    sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Almost always or always
    2 = Most times (more than half the time)
    3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
    4 = A few times (less than half the time)
    5 = Almost never or never
    0 = No sexual activity
    Q4: Over the past 4 weeks, how would you
    rate your level of sexual arousal (“turn on”)
    during sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Very high
    2 = High
    3 = Moderate
    4 = Low
    5 = Very low or none at all
    0 = No sexual activity
    Q5: Over the past 4 weeks, how confident
    were you about becoming sexually aroused
    during sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Very high confidence
    2 = High confidence
    3 = Moderate confidence
    4 = Low confidence
    5 = Very low or no confidence
    0 = No sexual activity
    Q6: Over the past 4 weeks, how often have you
    been satisfied with your arousal (excitement)
    during sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Almost always or always
    2 = Most times (more than half the time)
    3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
    4 = A few times (less than half the time)
    5 = Almost never or never
    0 = No sexual activity
    Q7: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did
    you become lubricated (“wet”) during sexual
    activity or intercourse? 1 = Almost always or always
    2 = Most times (more than half the time)
    3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
    4 = A few times (less than half the time)
    5 = Almost never or never
    0 = No sexual activity
    Q8: Over the past 4 weeks, how difficult
    was it to become lubricated (“wet") during
    sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Extremely difficult or impossible
    2 = Very difficult
    3 = Difficult
    4 = Slightly difficult
    5 = Not difficult
    0 = No sexual activity
    Q9: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did you
    maintain your lubrication (“wetness”) until
    completion of sexual activity or intercourse? 1= Almost always or always
    2 = Most times (more than half the time)
    3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
    4 = A few times (less than half the time)
    5 = Almost never or never
    0 = No sexual activity
    Q10: Over the past 4 weeks, how difficult was
    it to maintain your lubrication (“wetness”) until
    completion of sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Extremely difficult or impossible
    2 = Very difficult
    3 = Difficult
    4 = Slightly difficult
    5 = Not difficult
    0 = No sexual activity
    Q11: Over the past 4 weeks, when you had
    sexual stimulation or intercourse, how
    often did you reach orgasm (climax)? 1 = Almost always or always
    2 = Most times
    3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
    4 = A few times (less than half the time)
    5 = Almost never or never
    0 = No sexual activity
    Q12: Over the past 4 weeks, when you had
    sexual stimulation or intercourse, how
    difficult was it for you to reach orgasm
    (climax)?
    1 = Extremely difficult or impossible
    2 = Very difficult
    3 = Difficult
    4 = Slightly difficult
    5 = Not difficult
    0 = No sexual activity
    Q13: Over the past 4 weeks, how satisfied
    were you with your ability to reach orgasm
    (climax) during sexual activity or intercourse? 1 = Very satisfied
    2 = Moderately satisfied
    3 = About equally satisfied and dissatisfied
    4 = Moderately dissatisfied
    5 = Very dissatisfied
    0 = No sexual activity
    1 = Very satisfied
    Q14: Over the past 4 weeks, how satisfied
    have you been with the amount of emotional
    closeness during sexual activity between you
    and your partner?
    2 = Moderately satisfied
    3 = About equally satisfied and dissatisfied
    4 = Moderately dissatisfied
    5 = Very dissatisfied
    1= Very satisfied
    Q15: Over the past 4 weeks, how satisfied
    have you been with your sexual relationship
    with your partner? 2 = Moderately satisfied
    3 = About equally satisfied and dissatisfied
    4 = Moderately dissatisfied
    5 = Very dissatisfied
    1 = Very satisfied
    Q16: Over the past 4 weeks, how satisfied
    have you been with your overall sexual life?
    2= Moderately satisfied
    3 = About equally satisfied and dissatisfied
    4 = Moderately dissatisfied
    5 = Very dissatisfied
    0 = Did not attempt intercourse
    Q17: Over the past 4 weeks, how often
    did you experience discomfort or pain
    during vaginal penetration? 1 = Almost always or always
    2 = Most times (more than half the time)
    3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
    4 = A few times (less than half the time)
    5 = Almost never or never
    0 = Did not attempt intercourse
    Q18: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did
    you experience discomfort or pain following
    vaginal penetration? 1 = Almost always or always
    2 = Most times (more than half the time)
    3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
    4 = A few times (less than half the time)
    5 = Almost never or never
    0 = Did not attempt intercourse
    Q19: Over the past 4 weeks, how would you
    rate your level (degree) of discomfort or
    pain during or following vaginal penetration? 1 = Very high
    2 = High
    3 = Moderate
    4 = Low
    5 =Very low or none at all
    Scoring System
    The individual domain scores and full scale score of the FSFI are derived by the computational formula
    outlined in the table below. Individual domain scores are obtained by adding the scores of the individual
    items that comprise the domain and multiplying the sum by the domain factor (see below). The full scale
    score is obtained by adding the six domain scores. It should be noted that within the individual domains,
    a domain score of zero indicates that no sexual activity was reported during the past month.
    Domain Questions Score range Factor Minimum score Maximum score
    Desire 1, 2 1-5 0.6 1.2 6.0
    Arousal 3, 4, 5, 6 0-5 0.3 0 6.0
    Lubrication 7, 8, 9, 10 0-5 0.3 0 6.0
    Orgasm 11, 12, 13 0-5 0.4 0 6.0
    Satisfaction 14, 15, 16 0 (or 1)-5 0.4 0 6.0
    Pain 17, 18, 19 0-5 0.4 0 6.0
    Full Scale Score Range 2.0 36.0
    *For the complete FSFI questionnaire, instructions, and scoring algorithm, please see
    www.FSFIquestionnaire.com, or contact Raymond Rosen PhD, (Department of Psychiatry:
    UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854)
    Reprinted from: Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a
    multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function.” J Sex
    Marital Ther. 2000;26:191-208, with permission of Taylor & Francis, Ltd.

    Female Sexual Function Index
    (FSFI) *
    Response Options
    1 = Almost always or always
    Question
    Q1: Over the past 4 weeks, how often did
    you feel sexual desire or interest?
    2 = Most times (more than half the time)
    3 = Sometimes (about half the time)
    4 = A few times (less than half the time)
    5 = Almost never or never
    1 = Very high
    Q2: Over the past 4 weeks, how would you
    rate your level (degree) of sexual desire or
    interest? 2 = High
    3 = Moderate
    4 = Low
    5 = Very low or none at… more

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Enhance Existing Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Escores para predizer risco de endocardite por enterococcus

    Escores: DENOVA, DENOVi

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Por favor, coloque NEWS2

    A partir do novo protocolo deste ano pra manejo da sepse, news2 foi indicado como melhor escala para diagnosticar. Por favor, coloquem!

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. UCEIS

    UCEIS: Endoscopic score to evaluate severity of Ulcerative Colitis.

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Fórmula de Nadler
    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. FA ESC 2024

    Why is there no CHA₂DS₂-VA scale available, even though it has been included in the guidelines since 2024?

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Sugerencia de fórmulas

    ¡Hola! He sido usuaria de MedCalX desde hace más de 10 años y mi experiencia había sido muy buena. Recientemente he notado que faltan fórmulas útiles en medicina interna, la función de los flujos de trabajo que permiten agregar fórmulas y es buena pero no encuentro el sentido en tener que estar saliendo de la app, sobre todo porque no siempre puedo acceder al enlace cuando la conexión a internet es mala. Concretamente sugiero las siguientes fórmulas: ARISCAT, AUB-HAS2, escala de fragilidad de Rockwood, Caprini, NSQIP, NSQIP geriátrico.

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Nutric score

    Nutric score

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Findrisc

    Findrisc = risco de DM tipo 2

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Gerontopole Frailty screening test
    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Fórmula

    Incluir la clasificación de stevenson o nohoria de insuficiencia cardiaca

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating