Skip to content

Formula Suggestions

Let us know which new formula you would like to see included in MedCalc or how we can enhance existing formulas.

Are we missing a formula?

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

4896 results found

  1. Nescet criteria

    Radiologic evaluation for arterial stenosis.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. Escala de Boston

    Limpieza colónica

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. Porcentaje de grasa corporal

    Ampliad la formula de imc para determinar tambien el porcentaje de grasa corporal

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  4. clavicle

    Robinson Risk Score for calculation of nonunion risk for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Needs 3 inputs:

    1. Smoker (yes/no)
    2. Comminution - i.e. presence of 3 or more fracture fragments (yes/no)
    3. Absolute displacement (mm)

    Logit(p) = -5.616 + (1.324 x [1 if smoker or 0 if nonsmoker]) + (0.561 x [1 if comminuted fracture or 0 if noncomminuted fracture]) + (0.153 x
    absolute fracture displacement in millimeters).

    Percentage probability of nonunion = exp(logit[p])/(1 + exp[logit(p)]) x 100.

    Reference:
    Risk Factors for Nonunion After Nonoperative
    Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Fractures
    of the Clavicle, I.R. Murray, C.J. Foster, A. Eros, C.M. Robinson. J Bone…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  5. Bellhouse-dore

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  6. POVOC

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  7. Aclaramiento de amilasa

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  8. Ruling out coronary artery disease in primary care

    CMAJ 2010; 182(12):1295-1300

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  9. international Index of Érectile Function

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  10. Formula para el calculo del eje electrico cardiaco

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  11. Besinger score

    Zur Ermittlung des Zustands bei myasthenia gravis. (Neurologie)

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  12. Échelle ECPA

    L'échelle ECPA (Echelle Comportementale pour Personnes Âgées) est utilisée en gériatrie pour des personnes présentant des troubles de la parole. Cette échelle comporte huit items comprenant chacune cinq possibilités, cotées de 0 à 4. Le score total est compris entre 0 et 32 et va d'une absence de douleur à une douleur totale. L'observation du patient par le soignant, qui aboutira à la cotation, se réalise en deux temps. La première partie a lieu cinq minutes minimum avant le soin, la seconde a lieu après le soin. Le temps de cotation est de 1 à 5min. Il est impératif de…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  13. Ncdr cathpci bleeding risk

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  New Formulas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  14. Pap Score

    Palliativmedizin (palliative care)

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  15. GISSI SCORE

    Risk stratification scoring after MI.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  16. Greene

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  17. THE Apnea Hypopnea Index AND THE Respiratory Disturbance Index.

    This is an absolute wonderful app. I payed and have full access BiPAP love it. We do need a couple of calculators. Please see this. There is no known app in existence that had the two calculators. These are very important.

    1: THE Apnea Hypopnea Index.
    2: THE Respiratory Disturbance Index. THESE WOULD BE SO HELPFUL. IF I COULD TYPE IN THE NUMBER OF APNEAS, HYPOPNEAS AND RERAs and then the number of hours the patient slept to get the Apnea Hypopnea Index AND BELOW THAT NUMBER WAS the Apnea Hypopnea Index This would be indescribably wonderful. It would be…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  18. Criterios de guillain barre típico

    Criterios de asbury

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  19. Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument

    Diagnóstico clínico de neuropatía diabética.
    Feldman EL; et al Diabetes Care1994;17:1281

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  20. Urolithiasis Bonner Risk Index

    Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112(6): 83-91 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0083

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  New Formulas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
1 2 … 44 46 48 … 244 245
  • Don't see your idea?

Formula Suggestions

Categories